Archive for the 'Liberties' Category

October 10th, 2007
A new verb: to usmanov
by Phil Hunt

I’ve just invented a new word:
usmanov /’us mÉ™ nÉ’v/ verb to unsuccessfully attempt to stifle undesired content on the Internet by taking legal action against websites where the content appears, with the result that the undesired content becomes more widespread and better known. [named after Alisher Usmanov, a Russian/Uzbek billionaire who did this regarding allegations [...]


2 Comments



October 4th, 2007
A quick thought on ID cards
by Larry

Most of the concern about the government’s proposed ID card scheme stems not from the cards themselves, but from the enormous pool of centralized information which would underlie them. Plenty of suspicious minds believe that this is actually the real purpose of the plan.
But if Gordon Brown wants access to a vast system of interlinked [...]


6 Comments



December 21st, 2006
In Defence of the Long-Term Unemployed
by Merrick

Work Secretary John Hutton promises a crackdown on the long-term unemployed. He says a ‘hardcore’ of benefit claimants are spending years on the dole and should be forced to take opportunities or have their benefits cut.
Whereas in fact we’d be better off just giving them their dole and leaving them alone.


8 Comments



November 9th, 2006
Bigging up the database state
by Donald/TheJarndyceBlog

Sandra Bell is a name I keep hearing. She’s seemingly an independent commentator, a security rent-a-quote, who so far this week has been mostly puffing the NuLab line for a prime-time audience. I guess this isn’t exactly news, given she formerly worked for QinetiQ, a company very much part of Blair’s corporate state. A company [...]


3 Comments



October 4th, 2006
Talk amongst yourselves, we couldn’t possibly comment
by Donald/TheJarndyceBlog

One word absolutely not on the lips of political hacks, not even Tory political hacks, is… Abortion. Not this week, not any week. It’s impolite conversation inside the beltway.
But a post here last year (picked apart here) attracted over 250 comments. Just publishing the word is pure Google-juice. Everyone in the real world has an [...]


23 Comments



September 25th, 2006
Moralising myopia
by Paul

I was having a drink the other night with an agreeable-enough fellow, let’s call him Henry. All was going well until Henry, like the Guardian reader that he is, felt it necessary to bring up the war in Iraq.


9 Comments



August 8th, 2006
My building has every convenience
by Phil E

You can define a thing in many ways, especially when it’s an abstract concept (”terrorism”, “democracy”, “British values”…). You can define to persuade, by emphasising features you believe people will find desirable (or, in some cases, undesirable). Alternatively, you can define to exclude, emphasising features some people will find it impossible to sign up to. [...]


6 Comments



August 3rd, 2006
It’s morally right that people should die for my amusement
by John B

The BBC website has a reasonably sensible, if not impartial, article by a sports shooter about guns - specifically, on how they’re fun and basically safe, except for the very rare occasions when evil people get hold of them and go massacring.
Unsurprisingly, the ‘have your say’ comments are full of the usual suspects saying things like “aha, [...]


11 Comments



July 12th, 2006
Privacy? What privacy?
by Shuggy

David Aaronovitch takes the BBC’s John Humphreys to task for asking John Prescott to respond to questions based on internet rumours regarding his sex life. This is objectionable, he argues, because they are unsubstantiated and in any event irrelevant.   
It’s the standard liberal position he takes and the reasoning behind it is one I largely accept. How [...]


4 Comments



July 11th, 2006
British business under American rules
by Steve

The story of the Bermingham Three has finally made it from the business news to the front pages of the papers.  The alleged fraudsters have been fighting extradition for over two years but now that their last appeal has failed, they will be put on a plane for Houston on Thursday and will probably be [...]


17 Comments



May 15th, 2006
Spot the difference
by Eddie

On the one hand, we have a government which is going to tell the future generations that all is well. That we have “freedom, fairness, civil responsibilities [and] democracy”. But then notice the clever avoidance of the words rights, and liberties that are normally associated with the word “civil”. Then assess that in comparison with [...]


2 Comments



May 11th, 2006
Ambient government
by Jamie K

David Cameron’s speech at the Business in the Community Forum has caused a bit of a stir. The tradecraft seems to be pretty obvious. Vague mutterings about Tesco and inappropriate knickers for girls connects young smoothiechops with the concerns of middle class women in marginal seats. He chats their chat. He gripes their gripe. And [...]


2 Comments



May 3rd, 2006
On Foreign Prisoners and Xenophobia
by Bondwoman

Is there any problem with the way that the ‘foreign prisoners’ issue has been discussed in most of the media in the UK? In my view, emphatically, yes. Is it an appropriate policy response to the accusation of not having competently managed the existing procedures for managing the deportation or release of foreign prisoners for [...]


18 Comments



February 21st, 2006
Constitutional lessons from the past
by Nosemonkey

Walter Bagehot, The English Constitution (1867), Ch.VI - ‘Its Supposed Checks and Balances’:
“When the leading sect… in Parliament is doing what the nation do not like, an instant appeal ought to be registered and Parliament ought to be dissolved. But a zealot of a Premier will not appeal; he will follow his formulae; he will [...]


12 Comments